Google Ties Top Stories Carousel to AI Overviews Opt-Out
Google is testing a change that links the Top Stories carousel to AI Overviews, so opting out of one now risks losing the other for publishers.
Google is testing a change that moves its Top Stories carousel inside the AI Overview panel, meaning publishers who use Search Console's generative AI exclusion to opt out of AI Overviews will likely lose eligibility for that carousel slot too. This raises the stakes for any publisher weighing whether to block AI Overviews. The trade-off is no longer just about AI summaries, it now touches a placement that has historically driven direct clicks.
What changed?
Google is testing a shift that moves its Top Stories carousel up into the AI Overview panel itself, rather than showing it as a separate module lower on the page, according to Distinctly. This currently affects 17.5% of UK news searches that show the carousel at all, per the same report.
The trade-off is structural, not incidental. Because the carousel appears either inside the AI Overview or standalone, and never both, publishers using Search Console's generative AI exclusion will likely lose eligibility for the embedded placement, Distinctly notes. Opting out of AI Overviews doesn't just remove you from the AI summary, it can now remove you from the news carousel entirely.
This matters because the exclusion control itself is relatively new. It arrived in the UK as a result of Competition and Markets Authority pressure, and it now carries a visible cost: publishers who fought for the right to keep content out of AI training and summarisation are discovering that the same switch can cost them a visibility slot they still wanted, Distinctly reports.
There is also widespread confusion about which controls do what. Newzdash's John Shehata has clarified that blocking Google-Extended alone should not affect visibility in AI Overviews or Top Stories, because Google-Extended governs model training and grounding, while the Search Console exclusion is the separate, far more consequential control, according to Distinctly. Many site owners have reportedly been blocking the wrong thing and wondering why nothing changed.
This news lands against a backdrop of falling publisher traffic. Google Search traffic to publishers fell 34% over the past year, with smaller publishers hit hardest, Distinctly says. Meanwhile, other markets are only now getting AI Overviews at all: Google switched on AI Overviews and AI Mode in France on 22 July, roughly two months ahead of the 23 September deadline it had given publishers, promising an opt-out, separate reporting for AI search, and continued compensation, per the same source.
Why does this matter for your business?
If you run a news site, a blog with regularly updated content, or any brand that relies on being surfaced for timely topics, this is a genuine dilemma. Blocking AI Overviews used to feel like a clean, low-cost decision: keep your content out of AI-generated summaries and lose little else. Now it can mean losing a visible carousel placement too, one that has historically driven direct clicks rather than just citations.
The wider picture also reinforces something GEO practitioners have argued for months: not all content earns AI visibility equally, and originality pays off disproportionately. Publishing your own data earns a page 3.3 times more AI citations than average, but one format does nearly all of that work: the benchmark study that ranks named competitors against each other on something measurable, according to Distinctly. If your content strategy leans on recycled commentary rather than original data or comparisons, you are leaving citations on the table regardless of what you decide about the carousel.
There is a separate warning here for anyone selling products or services online. AI agents still cannot reliably read pricing pages, and when they fail to extract a price, 58% of the answer comes from third parties instead of you, per Distinctly. That means competitors, resellers or review sites could end up being the source AI systems quote for your own pricing, simply because your page was not structured in a way machines could parse.
Put together, these findings paint a picture of an ecosystem where the rules keep shifting in small but consequential ways. A control designed for one purpose, keeping content out of AI training, now has knock-on effects for an entirely different feature: the news carousel. That is the kind of nuance that is easy to miss if you are not actively tracking how your pages appear across AI surfaces.
What should you do now?
First, check exactly what you have blocked and why. If you are a publisher and you have enabled the Search Console generative AI exclusion, understand that this may now cost you carousel eligibility, not just AI Overview citations. Weigh that trade-off deliberately rather than by default.
Second, do not confuse Google-Extended with the Search Console exclusion. They do different jobs, and blocking the wrong one gives you neither the protection you wanted nor the visibility you might have kept.
Third, if you want AI citations, invest in original, comparative data. A benchmark study that names competitors and ranks them on something measurable is, based on the figures above, the single most reliable format for earning citations well above average.
Fourth, audit your pricing pages specifically. If AI systems cannot extract your price cleanly, a third party is likely answering that question for your customers instead of you. Structured, plainly stated pricing in crawlable HTML closes that gap.
Finally, if you are unsure how your brand currently appears, or does not appear, across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and other AI answer engines, it is worth checking your own AI visibility with Sited's free audit at https://sited.online before making decisions like this one.
Frequently asked questions
Does blocking Google-Extended stop my content from appearing in AI Overviews?
No. Blocking Google-Extended alone should not affect visibility in AI Overviews or Top Stories, because it governs model training and grounding, while the Search Console exclusion is the separate and far more consequential control. If you want to actually opt out of AI Overviews, you need that specific exclusion, not just a robots directive aimed at training data.
Will I lose my Top Stories carousel slot if I opt out of AI Overviews?
Likely yes, in markets where the carousel has moved inside the AI Overview panel. Because the carousel now appears either inside the AI Overview or standalone, and never both, publishers using the Search Console generative AI exclusion will likely lose eligibility for the embedded placement.
What kind of content earns the most AI citations?
Original, comparative data performs best by a wide margin. Publishing your own data earns a page 3.3 times more AI citations than average, and one format, the benchmark study ranking named competitors on something measurable, does nearly all of that work.
Why might AI answers quote a third party's price instead of mine?
Because AI systems still struggle to extract pricing directly from many product pages. When they fail to extract a price, 58% of the answer comes from third parties instead of you, so making pricing plain, structured and easy to parse in HTML reduces this risk.
Is this exclusion trade-off happening everywhere, or just in the UK?
The exclusion control itself arrived in the UK because of the Competition and Markets Authority, and the carousel-into-AI-Overview test has so far been observed there. Other markets, including France, are still catching up on basic AI Overview rollout, so similar trade-offs may follow as those features expand.

